Although there's been some useful exchange taking place in the Rapanos Guidance discussion, I wanted to start a separate discussion to collect some thoughts re the nexus determinations taking place.
Additionally, discussion/inputs related to the definition applied to 'signifant nexus' for determinations where a wetland may be adjacent but not abutting a relatively permanent non-navigable tributary. And in particular where hydrology is isolated but other ecologic parameters affect functional integrity of downstream waters. Supposedly, add'l guidance will be forthcoming re the definition of significant nexus.

I recently had a COE review of isolated wetland in the piedmont of NC and concurrence from COE staff. However, the COE Significant Nexus Form apparently is forwarded to the EPA then back to COE for final approval of isolated status. I'm interested in others recent determinations regarding this scenario.

Tom

Tom,

I understand that there is one staff member for the EPA out of Atlanta doing these determinations for Region 4. Have you heard who or how many will be doing these determinations in our region?

Am I correct that the EPA has 15 days to respond to USACE comments? If so, one person for 8 states is a tough workload for this poor fellow, whoever he is ...